“Rio +20” – How much of a failure was it?

19/06/2012 at 8:40 pm 1 comment

On 20-22 June, the UN Summit on Sustainable Development, or “Rio +20”, took place.

Some 50,000 people came to the Brazilian city, all with the hope of contributing in some small way to this important UN summit. As we set out in this blog post and in this video blog, expectations for this “too big to fail” summit were sky high.

But international summits have a tendency to disappoint.

(See also this letter)
As Jenny Rei Lavelo points out in this blog, this is often due to the many competing demands made on negotiators.

And there were indeed many different Visions for “Sustainable Development” being presented here. We have set out a few here.
(and click HERE for a more up-to-date list of key articles)

But it would seem that this time around, the summit headed for failure not because there was too much vision, but too little of it.

In the Summit Declaration – negotiated by civil servants since the beginning of the year, and updated in the early hours of 19 June – it was clear that Governments went for quantity rather than quality. The text is full of important-sounding statements, but the crucial paragraphs show very clearly that the negotiators have carefully avoided making any choices at all.

Some of the good things in the text:

  • An unambiguous statement that poverty eradication is “the greatest global challenge facing the world today”
  • A reaffirmation of a “commitment to making every effort to accelerate the achievement of the internationally agreed development goals, including the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015.”
  • A recognition “that people are at the center of sustainable development”
  • An expression of “deep concern” that “one in five people on this planet, or over one billion people, still live in extreme poverty, and that one in seven—or 14 percent—is undernourished.”
  • An affirmation of “the importance of supporting developing countries in their efforts to eradicate poverty and promote empowerment of the poor and people in vulnerable situations”
  • The explicit inclusion of the need for a set of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the potential for these SDGs to provide a basis for a new, internationally agreed Development framework, to succeed the MDGs.
  • Inclusion of a clear reference to the importance of food security and nutrition.
  • A reiteration of the key principle that the Polluter Pays: rich countries that caused most of the environmental damage should do most to fix it.
  • Article 47 has encouraged some interesting initiatives on corporate sustainability reporting (but falling short of actually shaping those initiatives!)

Some of the biggest disappointments:

  • A lack of recognition that current standards of consumption are unsustainable
  • Among the list of principles Governments “re-affirm” are many statements which have been blatantly ignored so far.
  • A recognition of “the need to accelerate progress in closing development gaps between developed and developing countries” – but not of the need to deliver on the 1992 Rio Summit principles mentioned in the same paragraph (and only a vague mention of “insufficient progress” in the next.
  • The whole section B, containing all the references to guiding principles shows that there is no consensus at all on what “Sustainable Development” really means.
  • Overall, the text “recognises” a great deal of problems, but fails to provide a response to them; instead, negotiators have been content with phrases like ‘commit to promote’ or ‘commit to consider’.
  • There is very little commitment to ending fossil fuel subsidies as a matter of urgency, or to introducing a Financial Transaction Tax
  • The document seems to shelve initiatives related to new mechanisms for sustainable development, such a High Commissioner for Sustainable Development and Future Generations
  • There is too much emphasis on large scale private sector to address challenges of sustainable development with no move from voluntary to mandatory corporate reporting on Human rights and sustainability impacts of activites by multinationals.

In short, there was no clear consensus on what to do at this summit. The EU and US pushed for clear outcomes on issues such as Water, Energy and Fuel, but the developing countries, coordinating in what is known as the G77, argued that, once more, rich countries were telling poorer countries to adopt models and technologies where the West holds all the advantages. Rather than focus on immediate outcomes in Rio, they seemed to be asking for a process to work out the vision for Sustainable Development.

Rio shows: Governments did not rise to the challenge, but others did.

The outcome document is weak, that is clear. Even Ban Ki-moon said “Let me be frank: Our efforts have not lived up to the measure of the challenge.”

But he also, rightly, said that “Rio+20” must be the start. In particular, the start of a global discussion on what an over-arching “Development” framework, that includes the best of the Human Rights framework, the MDGs and Rio’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

One last, tentative conclusion: it may well be that “Rio+20” has shown that the world is not waiting for Governments to catch up. Civil society groups, and private companies, have shown at Rio that they are prepared, and able, to move ahead with tangible initiatives on Sustainable Development. That is to be celebrated. It’s just a pity that Governments have not been able to keep up.

See e.g.:

On 20 June, NGOs told world leaders gathered in Rio: If you adopt the text in its current form, you will fail to secure a future for the coming generations, including your own children.” (https://rio20.un.org/rio20/records/page)

Read more, by using this more up-to-date list of Resources and Commentary

Entry filed under: Government. Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .

Rio+20 Video Blog #2 “Rio +20” fails to deliver for the Planet, for Poor People, or for Future Generations

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. kimbowarichard  |  20/06/2012 at 2:50 pm

    Thanks for this analysis. I just want to add that Rio + 20 leaves a legacy of a lost opportunity because it fails to create something beyond business as usual

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 214 other followers

Archives

Dóchas on Twitter

The World's Best News - images

One of the most important graphs. Ever.

http://ourworldindata.org/data/health/maternal-mortality/ Today is World Food Day.

A day to celebrate that the days of truly enormous famines are over: http://blog.concern.net/global-hunger-index-2015-mapping-the-worlds-hunger Meet "Chocolate Mamas", producers of chocolate in #Tanzania, creating Tanzanian jobs. 
While #cocoa is grown in West Africa and Asia,
most #chocolate (the finished product) is made in Europe or the USA.

Meet Jaki Kweka, who is trying to change that. By creating protected areas and national parks and by limiting the spread of soy bean cultivation, Brazil has managed to drastically reduce the amount of rain forest being cleared.

http://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/deforestation-in-the-amazon-has-plummeted-almost-90pt/ Costa Rica, #Afghanistan, China, #India and Albania are all embracing renewable energy sources.

http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/sep/15/five-developing-countries-ditching-fossil-fuels-china-india-costa-rica-afghanistan-albania?CMP=share_btn_tw Social change needs empowered citizens, and empowered citizens need occasional encouragement.

Great to hear that we're not the only ones who believe in the power of positive news! 50,000 rice farmers in #IvoryCoast are now working with better seeds, improving food security in the West African country.

As a result, harvests have increased.

Source: World Bank, photo: Jbdodane / CC BY Sub-Saharan Africa’s first light rail system starts operations. 
As Ethiopians celebrate their New Year, they also prepare to mark the beginning of operations of a tram system in the #Ethiopian capital #AddisAbaba. 
Read more: http://mgafrica.com/article/2015-09-20-sub-saharan-africas-first-light-rail-system-starts-operationsyou-guessed-it-in-ethiopia Going Mobile in #Malawi”. A mobile phone information service established last year to provide timely information to rural poor farmers in a southern African country, has been used nearly half a million times since its launch.

Established in Malawi by Gorta-Self Help Africa last year, the ‘321’ voice-activated service provides subscribers to the country’s largest mobile phone network with farm information and advice that they can access at the push of a button. And it’s all free. Read more at http://dochas.ie/sites/default/files/The-Worlds-Best-News-2015_0.pdf 10,000 copies of "The World's Best News" were distributed all over #ireland today!

See how The Irish Times described our newspaper, and click the link to read all the articles online!

http://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/inside-out/have-you-read-the-world-s-best-news-1.2355806

Visitors Map

Map

Dóchas Photos

President of Ireland, Michael D. Higgins and members of the YMCA youth group.

President of Ireland, Michael D. Higgins at the 2016 Irish Summit on the Sustainable Development Goals at Croke Park hosted by Dóchas

More Photos

%d bloggers like this: